Xenu Made Me Make This Post
Jan. 27th, 2008 10:03 amI wonder if anyone has ever considered if Scientology is an intentional parody of religion?
I'm pretty sure that was not ElRon's original intention, but it would please me greatly if that had been the case, and it does serve as a pretty excellent object example.
I'm pretty sure that was not ElRon's original intention, but it would please me greatly if that had been the case, and it does serve as a pretty excellent object example.
no subject
Date: 2008-01-27 06:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-27 06:23 pm (UTC)I <3 Gawker.
no subject
Date: 2008-01-27 06:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-27 08:06 pm (UTC)You do realize that the juxtaposition of "good idea" and "Hubbardland" leads to a paradox, right?
Unless, by good idea you mean "Make shittons of money!"
no subject
Date: 2008-01-27 06:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-27 06:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-28 03:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-27 06:47 pm (UTC)They aren't so much a parody as way around the unethical and illegal taxation of our citizens. As for being a money-making venture, most things of value are. I know they gave me free services when I was suicidal and pulled me out of a state I couldn't get out on my own.
Just my opinions.
no subject
Date: 2008-01-27 07:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-27 07:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-27 10:27 pm (UTC)I ask because the distance from
If this isn't the case, my apologies for being rather forward here.
...and as a preemptive precaution: I'm not in any way associated with Scientology, nor do I wish to be. To me, as a "religion," they rate about on the same level as most others, but for the spectacularly crappy PR job they've done. Sure, they have a number of nut-jobs in their fold, and some of their tenets and advice are both ludicrous and (IMO) outright harmful, in my opinion... but then, I'm hard pressed to name a religion about which that isn't true.
no subject
Date: 2008-01-28 05:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-28 09:42 pm (UTC)...but what wasn't surprising?
no subject
Date: 2008-01-28 07:43 am (UTC)In any event, further discussion is likely to be entirely fruitless, and therefore a waste of time.
no subject
Date: 2008-01-27 09:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-27 08:55 pm (UTC)The two main problems Scientology seems to have are a mythological structure that did not seem to age very well and without a clear methodology to evolve, and a very bad strategy at handling outside criticism. Now that I think about it, most other religions didn't seem to do either of these things very well in their infancy. Maybe it's something like growing pains?
no subject
Date: 2008-01-27 10:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-28 04:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-28 03:55 pm (UTC)I'll say this though;
They gave me free services when I was in really bad shape in 1997. Nobody seems to know they help out people in crisis in that way. I also don't pay any dues or any of that kind of stuff. If they have a workshop that interests me, then I go and pay the fee. It is pretty simple economics from my end.
I'm also a practicing Zen-Buddist. Neither one seems to conflict with the other.
Scientology has a lot of weird stuff associated with it, and I personally haven't seen ANY of it (aside from these creepy videos and some FANATICAL people, who seem to show up in ALL philosophies and religions). I've also never tried to get anyone else to go there. If someone asks what I think, I tell them my story and leave it at that. I just don't like when people just start bashing it out of knowhere, usually to look cool to their friends. Isn't that what so many people on LJ land are trying to get away from from? The whole us vs them mentality of High School?
no subject
Date: 2008-01-27 07:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-27 09:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-27 09:26 pm (UTC)One of the funniest movies ever - especially the traffic scene. :)
no subject
Date: 2008-01-27 08:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-27 09:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-27 08:55 pm (UTC)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientology_controversy#L._Ron_Hubbard_and_starting_a_religion_for_money
no subject
Date: 2008-01-27 09:31 pm (UTC)Have you read Sturgeon?
God DAYEM he's amazing!
no subject
Date: 2008-01-27 09:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-27 10:34 pm (UTC)Panorama - Scientology and Me
no subject
Date: 2008-01-28 12:39 am (UTC)whew. i feel like it's time for some word clearing now. let me go learn up on the tone scale.
Storm the studio
Date: 2008-01-30 12:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-28 12:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-28 04:58 am (UTC)Not a religion at all....
Date: 2008-01-28 11:22 am (UTC)LRH took great "technologies" from a lot of different places... So I tried to read Dianetics, but I stopped when it said the Government had a sex ray aimed at me. I just couldn't swallow that. Like my sex drive needs a JATO!
no subject
Date: 2008-01-28 11:08 pm (UTC)And I think that's the important thing to keep in mind- we'd be against any church that acted in a manner so irresponsibly and so criminally. Scientolgoists should be as free as anyone to believe as they see fit. The Church of Scientology, however, has a long criminal history that involves the control, injury, and deaths of its adherents, the harassment and assault of its critics, and the infiltration and extortion of the United States Government. An organisation which behaves as the CoS has behaved must not be tolerated in society, regardless of whether it styles itself a Church, a business, or a Mafia.
no subject
Date: 2008-01-29 05:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-31 10:14 am (UTC)As I understand it (from conversations with People Who Ought to Know at WorldCon 1987), ElRon invented Dianetics and Scientology for a bet ('I bet you can't invent a viable religion' kind of thing), then realised it would make a lot of money and ran with it.