Page Summary
gordonzola.livejournal.com - (no subject)
t3knomanser.livejournal.com - (no subject)
rhiannonstone.livejournal.com - (no subject)
quodlibetic.livejournal.com - (no subject)
mactavish.livejournal.com - (no subject)
fizzyg23.livejournal.com - (no subject)
novapsyche.livejournal.com - (no subject)
tyrsalvia.livejournal.com - (no subject)
elric-dewisant.livejournal.com - (no subject)
dubpulse.livejournal.com - (no subject)
dubpulse.livejournal.com - (no subject)
ewhac.livejournal.com - (no subject)
cr0wgrrl.livejournal.com - An LJ
mistressxenobia.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Style Credit
- Style: by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2007-06-11 12:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-11 01:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-11 01:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-11 01:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-11 01:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-11 02:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-11 02:42 am (UTC)I sometimes spell out LiveJournal, but usually only when I'm referring to the site as a whole. LJ I generally use as an adjective (as in "an LJ post").
no subject
Date: 2007-06-11 02:45 am (UTC)Using articles with abbreviations and acronyms:
One of the most often asked questions about grammar has to do with the choice of articles — a, an, the — to precede an abbreviation or acronym. Do we say an FBI agent or a FBI agent? Although "F" is obviously a consonant and we would precede any word that begins with "F" with "a," we precede FBI with "an" because the first sound we make when we say FBI is not an "f-sound," it is an "eff-sound." Thus we say we're going to a PTO meeting where an NCO will address us. We say we saw a UFO because, although the abbreviation begins with a 'U," we pronounce the "U" as if it were spelled "yoo." Whether we say an URL or a URL depends on whether we pronounce it as "earl" or as "u*r*l."
From here.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-11 02:48 am (UTC)I wouldn't look down upon anyone who used 'a LJ' or 'a eljay', but I also wouldn't want to proofread anything they wrote, either.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-11 04:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-11 04:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-11 05:41 am (UTC)Another is that the article should be dependent on the vocalization of the abbreviation; "ell-jay", hence, "an LJ post."
Yet another is that, since the abbreviation is a stand-in for another word/set of words, the article should depend on the expanded abbreviation; "LJ == LiveJournal", hence, "a LJ post."
Strunk & White, The Chicago Manual of Style, or any newspaper editor you can button-hole should be able to definitively answer the question.
An LJ
Date: 2007-06-11 08:04 pm (UTC)Uncertainty often arises concerning the proper choice of the indefinite article before an acronym. A workable solution may be based on the way such an abbreviation is read. The assumption is that an acronym is read either as a series of letters or as a neologism, or coined word. Rarely is the acronym read as though all of the words were spelled out. If, as is usually the case, the acronym is treated as a series of letters, the choice of the article depends upon the pronunciation of the first letter:
* an NAACP position
* a TVA power station
If the acronym is widely pronounced as though it were a word, the article is determined by the pronunciation of the word:
* a NATO meeting
* a LOOM parade
* an NFL team
Hence, an LJ.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-12 05:39 am (UTC)THE ANSWER IS PINEAPPLES!